Style.com

April 21 2014

styledotcom The hair trend that totally transforms your face: stylem.ag/1jWoq7e

Subscribe to Style Magazine

Brad Pitt For Chanel No. 5; Heidi Klum Grabs An(other) Endorsement Deal; And More…

-------

It’s official: The Jolie-Pitts are getting into the beauty contract business. But it’s Brad, not Angelina, who will be doing face time—for Chanel No. 5, no less. Is it weird that Pitt’s very masculine image will be used to sell the iconic women’s fragrance? Seeing as how this is the image in question (please direct your attention due left), the answer is decidedly “no.” [Chanel]

Unilever is poised to bring its Clear Scalp & Hair Beauty Therapy brand—a complete lineup of scalp and strand products already available in 42 other countries—to America this month, and they’re doing so with the star power of Heidi Klum, who will serve as brand ambassador. [NYT]

A new H&M ad featuring a scantily clad—and heavily bronzed—Isabeli Fontana is generating some complaints from the Swiss Cancer League, which is calling the images “alarming” and “completely [contradictory]” to their efforts to deter indoor and outdoor tanning abuse. Oops. [Daily Mail]

NARS Cosmetics’ heavily anticipated Andy Warhol color collection won’t be on shelves until October, but the brand has released a (very) short teaser video to generate excitement in the mean time. [YouTube]

Photo: Jeffrey Mayer/WireImage

USER COMMENTS Comments

Comments

  1. rsaenz says:

    It’s stupid of The House of Chanel to have Brad. Really? That desparate? I don’t think so. I’ve lost some respect for them.
    I love Karl, but the Chanel needs new life. Chanel has been boring the past decade.

  2. QkL5Ie says:

    614047 186495This sort of wanting to come to a difference in her or his lifestyle, initial usually Los angeles Excess weight weightloss scheme is really a large running in as it reached that strive. weight loss 954915

  3. 998209 181811Thanks for some other informative web site. The place else may I get that type of information written in such an ideal approach? 180846