Style.com

Style File Blog

november 25, 2009

Designer update

By Invitation Only: VonRosen

04:11 PM
An interesting invite came across my desk recently. Inside the leather-bound envelope was a...

Social intelligence

Siobhan Fahey’s Back And Better Than Ever

03:11 PM

Trend tracking

Yea, Nay, or Eh? Leonor Scherrer’s Head Games

02:11 PM

more from the style file blog ›

MEMBER SIGN-IN
We're sorry, we can't find the username and password combination you've submitted. Please try resubmitting your information. Please note, username and password are not case sensitive.
Not a Style.com member? Join now, it's free and easy.
Remember me next time
NOT A MEMBER?
Join Style.com to get full access to our special features and community. It's fast and free.
join now
JOIN NOW
We're sorry, but we could not accept your request. Incomplete/incorrect fields are highlighted in the form below with a ! symbol. Please fill out these fields and click submit.

To access this feature, fill in the fields below and click "Submit." To get full access to Style.com's special features and community, join now

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Style.com. Yes   No
I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Mobile Terms and Conditions.
LEAVE A COMMENT
We're sorry, but we could not accept your request. Incomplete/incorrect fields are highlighted in the form below with a ! symbol. Please fill out these fields and click submit.
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
Email me when there are new comments

Q&A

Double Vision

May 4, 2009  11:04 pm

While some stars enjoy a red-carpet surprise (Madonna, we’re looking at you), other celebs stick to a favorite silhouette. For Kirsten Dunst, one of those shapes is a twenties-inspired gown with sheer panels, short sleeves, and marabou detail. Witness the actress’ two Chanel frocks—the navy one she wore tonight to the Met ball and the aquamarine dress she donned at the 2007 Oscars. Which do you prefer?

tags: , ,



USER COMMENTS  (6)
  1. Aquamarine

    By jA_1 on 05/5/09 at 4:01 pm
  2. I really love the dark blue color. It looks more elegant to me, and I’m not a fan of the feathered bottom of the light blue.

    By Lystelen on 05/5/09 at 8:32 pm
  3. MADONNAAA YEAH!! nice surpirse though :)
    I like that Chanel dress that kirsten wore… It was definitely different from the rest and she looked good, better than the previous one!

    By tr_ro on 05/6/09 at 12:51 am
  4. HAHA … I thought the same exact thing when I saw this dress. However, this one is worst !

    By sgalindo7 on 05/6/09 at 10:48 pm
  5. Allow me to make my previous comment clear … I meant I thought that the dresses looked alike … this one is defeinitely worst … just to bring the point home ;)

    By sgalindo7 on 05/6/09 at 10:50 pm
  6. fisrt i’d like to say that there is no aquamarine dress there…. Nevertheless, i do prefer that Oscars one she wore. Both of them have details that are detestable. the sleeves on the first one and the bottom details on the second one. But the second one is less overflowing. She’s tryig too hard

    By RobChameleo on 07/22/09 at 9:51 pm