August 28 2014

styledotcom When did we become so obsessed with butts, though?

Subscribe to Style Magazine

Yea, Nay, Or Eh: Kate Beckinsale, Over-Accessorized?


It seems ironic that Kate Beckinsale once starred in a film by the title of Uncovered, because the tiny actress ventured out in L.A. yesterday practically hidden by big shades, a gigantic Bally bag, and substantial boots (paired, as it happens, with the shortest of shorts). We know that some sort of mufti is essential for stars trying to throw off the paparazzi, but do you think, like us, that Beckinsale’s accessories are just too much? Let us know.




  1. birdiup says:

    How can you be overaccessorized with three accessories? Kinda shabby, maybe. Over-accessorized?…no way!

  2. tr_ro says:

    Yes, too much!

  3. dianayeary says:

    act your age, not your shoe size.

  4. flightofthedreamer says:

    Not at all! I like it a lot. Those boots are hot!

  5. mlyoung says:

    Way too much! The bag is excessive.

  6. meriah64 says:

    Yes she has over done it. I really belive she needs to pick what season she’s in. Please loose the boots.

  7. gatabella says:

    So this is an atrocity but the try-hard, ring-on-every-finger Olsens are fine? This looks like Kate was caught off-guard wearing a bad accessory combo on an off day, but it is not over-accesorization.

  8. gretaful says:

    Those boots deserve better than those shorts!!

  9. JohnAgee says:

    Not over-accessorized, just hopelessly unsophistocated.

  10. mb3253 says:

    i love the boots and the ring – but i´ve definitely seen shorter shorts than these!

  11. shawanda says:

    I agree with birdlup: shabby.

  12. twittikat says:

    I don’t think the problem is over accessorizing so much as it is the shorts with the accessories… this look would probably be great if she’d worn skinny jeans instead

  13. andreverde says:

    yes… too much. She should’ve placed some tom shoes on or any california-like flops, I’d place more appropriate pair of shoes…

Trend Tracking