blog

MEMBER SIGN-IN

We're sorry, we can't find the username and password combination you've submitted. Please try resubmitting your information. Please note, username and password are not case sensitive.

Not a Style.com member? Join now, it's free and easy.

USERNAME PASSWORD

Remember me next time

forgot Sign-In Information?

submit

NOT A MEMBER?

Join Style.com to get full access to our special features and community. It's fast and free.

join now

JOIN NOW

We're sorry, but we could not accept your request. Incomplete/incorrect fields are highlighted in the form below with a ! symbol. Please fill out these fields and click submit.

To access this feature, fill in the fields below and click "Submit." To get full access to Style.com's special features and community, join now

USERNAME

PASSWORD

E-MAIL ADDRESS

CONFIRM PASSWORD

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Style.com.

Yes No

I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Mobile Terms and Conditions.

SUBMIT

celebrities exposed

March 27, 2008 4:42 pm

For all the hype over Carla Bruni-Sarkozy’s choice of demure Dior in which to greet the Queen, one could easily forget the reasons behind the visit in the first place (an Anglo-French axis; the U.K. in the EU; a joint nuclear power program). But it seems only fair to give equal press to the first lady’s duds as it does to her dishabille. Another dame familiar with royals, Helen Mirren, has been honored for her, er, body of work. And if evidence of the European embrace of exposure wasn’t stark enough, Bruce Weber’s racy—but arty!—new catalog for Abercrombie & Fitch will only be available in London. A U.S. roundup of the year’s unsexiest men clears the way for a new era of heartthrobs, the Ripsters, Dior Homme wearers with abs of steel. Does Karl Lagerfeld count? He’s got muscle—or should we say his bodyguards do?

—Alison Baenen

tags: