MEMBER SIGN-IN
We're sorry, we can't find the username and password combination you've submitted. Please try resubmitting your information. Please note, username and password are not case sensitive.
Not a Style.com member? Join now, it's free and easy.
Remember me next time
NOT A MEMBER?
Join Style.com to get full access to our special features and community. It's fast and free.
join now
JOIN NOW
We're sorry, but we could not accept your request. Incomplete/incorrect fields are highlighted in the form below with a ! symbol. Please fill out these fields and click submit.
To access this feature, fill in the fields below and click "Submit." To get full access to Style.com's special features and community, join now

Please send me occasional e-mail updates about new features and special offers from Style.com. Yes   No
I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Mobile Terms and Conditions.
LEAVE A COMMENT
We're sorry, but we could not accept your request. Incomplete/incorrect fields are highlighted in the form below with a ! symbol. Please fill out these fields and click submit.
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
Email me when there are new comments

Dept. of culture

purple’s reign, 16 years in

May 27, 2008  12:23 pm

Purple

With all the nineties nostalgia in the air, it’s no surprise to see the release of Olivier Zahm and Elein Fleiss’ “Purple Anthology” (Rizzoli), which can be read as an authoritative guide to turn-of-the-millennium cutting-edge culture (or, as the 16-year-old magazine might put it, to “art, prose, fashion, music, architecture, sex”). The book consists of photos of pages and spreads from old issues, with every year accompanied by a personal essay by a Purple affiliate (Chloë Sevigny, Terry Richardson, et al.), full of anecdotes both blasé and poignant. From 1994, here’s Kim Gordon on the death of Kurt Cobain: “Because he was a public figure, the communal mourning was a T-shirt, no matter how exploitative it seemed. The difference, though, is that if you knew the person, then their death is not cool, it’s not a cool stance. It’s not a cool T-shirt.”

tags:



USER COMMENTS  (0)
Style.com